• Me [when yoga instructor demonstrates the bhujapidasana asana]:

    “Weird flex but OK.”

  • A riddle:

    “What activity is this?”

    • “You can do this activity at the beginning or end of a horse race but not the middle.

    • This activity is acceptable to do in public but unacceptable in your bedroom.

    • It is illegal to have sex with an animal before this activity, but legal afterwards.

    • Some feel ethically required to do it, while others feel required not to.

    • It is ethical to do it to an animal, but not to your grandparents.

    • It’s acceptable to do it for yourself or family, but not strangers; however, it’s acceptable for strangers to do it for strangers/you….

    • You can legally do it reliably and painlessly for animals, but only legally do it unreliably and extremely painfully for humans.”

  • Band names inspired by colds:

    “Angels & Aspirations”; “The Breath Boys”; “Gesündheit”; “Infectious Clown Posse”; “Jaw Division”/“Joy Omission”; “Mucus Machine”; “The Nasal Dilaters”; “Phlegm Phighters”; “Snotson and the Boogers”; “Trigeminal Treachery”; “Tylenol Tears”; “WBC48”; “Flugees”; “Rage Against The Mucus”; “Lemontonix”; “Croakwerk”; “God Bless You Sick Emperor”; “This Is Dimetapp”; “And You Will Know Us By The Trail Of DM”; “Explosions in the Sinus”; “Roxy Mucus”; “Sneezy Top”; “Amy Benadryl”; “Hachoo-ne Miku”; “Megurine Puka”; “Sniffles of a Down”; “Linkin’ Puke”; “Lil Oozy”; “Germs & Blows”; “Halls-y”; “Miley Sinus”; “Justin Sneezer”; “Johnny Cough”; “Milky Chunks”; “Plan Slime From Outer Space”; “Coldpray”; “The Long Dark Peetime of the Soul”; “Puke Floyd”; “Honkie and the Blowsniff”

  • Things which sound like war crimes but aren’t: “carcinisation”; “Burma-Shave”; “English breakfast”; “marsupialization”

  • Shower thought: That all cats love to sit in cardboard boxes & even fall for square optical illusions suggests an innate evolved preference, implying that in their historical range—though they would not fossilize—there are cryptid wild species of the now-domesticated Amazon boxes.

  • Q. What happens to old computational complexity theorists who run out of usable bits?

    A. They Requiescat In PSPACE.

  • Heard terrible joke:

    Q. “What’s a negative utilitarian’s SI unit for measuring brains?”
    A. “hertz”

    (It is terrible because life is terrible.)

  • Q. what do you call a horse who doesn’t believe in humans?

    A. naythiest

  • Q. What is the Norse god Odin’s favorite cooking spice?

    A. Allspice.

  • Q. What was the trans programmer’s favorite cat coat color?

  • Senryū:

    The summer garbage—
    the sole remnant of many
    bright engineers’ dreams

    Raccoon boldly strides
    through the bright summershine.
    (Maybe it’s rabies.)

    Mosquito buzzing
    this late in the winter
    —still not a mother…

  • When I was younger, I was confused by occasional references to fugue states. Eventually I looked it up properly, and learned that:

    • When you get lost in Bach’s Musical Offering, that’s a “fugue state”.

    • When you are entranced by the delicate flavor of pufferfish, that’s a “fugu state”.

    • When you’re obsessed with French cuisine, that’s a “fondue state”.

    • When you’re feeling hip, that’s a “FUBU state”.

    • When you’re fantasizing about murdering someone, that’s a “FU state”.

    • When you’re addicted to tourist money, that’s a “Fiji state”.

  • The existence of “Comic Sans” troublingly implies a “Tragic Sans”, while the existence of young female “toddlers” implies the existence of young male “toddlims”.

    The existence of “whip-poor-wills” implies the existence of the more lucrative sex worker niche “whip-rich-wills”; further: the existence of “nuclear subs” implies “nuclear doms”, “shadow DOMs” imply “Jungian submissives”, and “capybara” imply “capyuri”.

    The existence of “parakeets” implies infantry keets, “meth labs” “meth poodles” & “meth retrievers”, “Petty officers” “Tom officers”, “red fire ants” “blue fire ants”, “Pepsi Max” “Pepsi Min”, “domestic partners” “feral partners”, “Château d’If” the even more inescapable prison “Château d’Iff”.

  • Preparing for dinner: mincing meat.

  • Some population ethicists argue that, because existing is a good, we are morally obligated to breed small brachycephalic dogs who suffer & have shorter life expectancy instead of healthy dogs, as turnover ensures more total dog existences; this is called the “Repugnant Conclusion”.

  • There is a concerning tendency in Western Christmas cuisine to replace the traditional English fruitcake with other breads—often more heavily sugared—but still call it “fruitcake”. This is stollen valor.

  • A “gaff” is an embarrassing mistake or blunder, such as misspelling a common word.

  • The study of what is really going on in Neal Stephenson’s interconnected novels is known as ‘Root cause analysis’.

  • First they came for the Bayesians.

    After that, things were fine (p > 0.05).

    Then, things were fine (p > 0.05).

    Then, things were fine (p > 0.05).

    Then things were not fine (p < 0.05), but we don’t know how not fine they were (β 95% CI: 0.51–0.99).

    Then we stopped publishing results about non-fine things, and our final meta-analytic result concluded:

    things are fine (p > 0.05).

  • WotC has announced its latest D&D revision to appeal to streaming generations. Please update all character sheets stats & repurchase all your content, as follows:

    STR

    BRO

    DEX

    ICE

    CON

    HRD

    INT

    KEK

    WIS

    CAP

    CHA

    RIZ

    Table: ⚔️

  • The Master discoursed on the Dharma-truth:

    “The Buddha-nature is seen in all things: the Great Buddha of Kyoto, a stray dog, even a dried shit-stick!”

    A novice asked: “Can it be seen in a storm sewer?”

    The Master replied: “Even inside the storm sewers of Tokyo!”

    The novice again asked: “Can it be seen in fossil fuels?”

    “E’en inside the empty gas tank of a liquefied natural gas ship!”

    He persisted: “Can it even be seen in the optimal packing of squares inside squares?”

    The Master shifted. “Today’s lecture is over.”

  • The most forbidden sweet/savory 2×2:

  • Ertly Lust:

    “Your committal and hinged presentation left me whelmed—choate, corrigible, almost too scrutable”, she gruntled at me: “Effable, yet maculate.”

    Couthly and gainly, she sipidly seduced me with her next-door pareil. Resigned, she cleaved into my feckful arms under sanctioned oversight.

    We tabled our delible doubts as the air grew inflammable. Illusioned and plussed, I was glad to look kempt (eviting her surmountable scorn).

    Despite feeling fatigable, we began raveling our entwined desires, and eptly, even wieldly—I bolted her fast.

  • In computer networking, if you do it right, a little bit goes a long way.

  • See “Human Cannibalism Alignment Chart”.

  • Her [🥺]: “wd u still love me if i was reborn as a 🪱”

    Me [🧘]: “By virtue bound, not fading form.
    Should worm-birth come through heavy deeds—
    Reviling Buddha, mocking maimed,
    Or toy windmill play—I must not.”

  • Claim: “Masseuse has Charms to soothe a savage Beast.” Factcheck:

    Verdict: We rate this claim 0⁄4 Pinocchios.

  • DSM-5 criteria for “addiction”:

    Men: that’s not your old friend heroin. That’s your girlfriend. (cf. “Is The NIH A Cult?”)

  • After Jonas & Kording2016 & ConCon:

    • Could a AI Consciousness Researcher Understand Human Consciousness?

    • Could a Philosopher of Mind Understand The Female Mind?

    • Could a Behaviorist Train a Teenager to Clean Their Room?

    • Could a Benchmark Designer Pass a Turing Test?

    • Could a Catastrophic Risk Modeler Buy Travel Insurance?

    • Could a Consciousness Metric Survive a Desperate PM?

    • Could a Fristonian Enjoy a Rollercoaster?

    • Could a Game Theorist Split the Bill?

    • Could a Gradient Follow a Hunch?

    • Could a Linear Probe Detect a Crush?

    • Could an AI Alignment Researcher Align a Multinational?

    • Could an AI Safety Researcher Childproof a House?

    • Could an Effective Altruist Optimize a Birthday Gift?

    • Could an Existential Risk Researcher Meet a Deadline?

    • Could an Inner Alignment Researcher Keep a New Year’s Resolution?

    • Could an Interpretability Researcher Debug a Dream?

    • Could a Panpsychist Know If Their Chair Is Uncomfortable?

    • Could a Phenomenologist Bracket a Synthetic Experience?

    • Could a Phenomenologist Describe Red to GPT?

    • Could a Red-Teaming Expert Survive Thanksgiving Dinner?

    • Could a Responsible AI Officer Say No?

    • Could a RL Researcher Train a Cat?

    • Could a Sandbagging Expert Convincingly Lose at Tic-Tac-Toe to a Child?

    • Could Connectomics Emulate a Plate of Spaghetti?

    • Could IIT Identify a Conscious Spreadsheet?

    • Could Mesa-Optimization Explain Why I Keep Opening the Fridge?

    • Could RLHF Learn to Apologize Sincerely?

    • Could Preference Learning Survive a Group Chat?

    • Could Scalable Oversight Scale to One Intern?

    • Could Value Learning Learn What Your Mother Meant by ‘Fine’?

    • Is the Chinese Room an Underpaid Annotator?

    • Is Qualia Denial Just Undiagnosed Aphantasia?

    • Is Eliminative Materialism Just Alexithymia?

    • Is Anti-Natalism Just Chronic Allergies?

  • some AI creative-writing drills:

    tired of girls asking for a “dominant” man. what about the Sniveling Cowards?? we need love too. looking for a gf who will let me hide under the bed when the pizza guy comes